易伯华首发最新6月26日GRE精准预测作文机经 满分Argument范文赏析

北京GRE培训,GRE备考资料,GRE网课,GRE培训机构,GRE保分班,GRE真题,GRE课程

6月26日GRE写作考试，Argument部分做有可能出现的作文题目是哪两道?下面小编就为大家带来最新的GRE作文精准预测机经题目，不光有题目，还有专家权威分析和思路点拨，一共两道，赶快一起来看吧!

最新发布：6月17日真题已经发布 点此查看 作文/阅读/填空/数学

另外，本场6月26日其他题型机经预测：阅读/填空/数学 请走这里

ETS官方题库No. 51

The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy PancakeHouse

restaurants.

"Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake

Houserestaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change,

however, has had little impact on our customers. In fact, only about 2 percent

of customers have complained, indicating that an average of 98 people out of 100

are happywith the change. Furthermore, many servers have reported that a number

of customers who ask for butter do not complain when they are given margarine

instead. Clearly, either these customers do not distinguish butter from

margarine or they use the term 'butter' to refer to either butter or

margarine."

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to

evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen

the argument.

【思路点拨】

本题主要论证点集中在对“98%的顾客对于替换行为满意”以及“顾客不投诉或者是没有鉴别能力，或者是用词含混”这两条假设的其他解释上面。顾客不投诉有很多其他可能性，应推测一下顾客不去投诉的其他合理解释。

Fallacies论证中的不足：

1. False dilemma (极端选择).Some customers might be unhappy but didn’t

complain.

2. Vague data (数据模糊). The author fails to point out the actual number of

server who reported, and what percentage of the whole server group do they make

up. Also, the author does not tell us the percentage of customers who do not

complain, thus the conclusion that the change had little impact is

unfounded.

3. False dilemma (极端选择).The fact that few customers complain when they are

given margarine might be explained by other factors, e.g., they may prefer the

lower price of margarine, or they have no time or disdain to argue with the

restaurant.

点击查看参考范文

ETS官方题库No. 74

The president of Grove College has recommended that the college abandon its

century-old tradition of all-female education and begin admitting men. Pointing

to other all-female colleges that experienced an increase in applications after

adopting coeducation, the president argues that coeducation would lead to a

significant increase in applications and enrollment. However, the director of

the alumnae association opposes the plan. Arguing that all-female education is

essential to the very identity of the college, the director cites annual surveys

of incoming students in which these students say that the school's all-female

status was the primary reason they selected Grove. The director also points to a

survey of Grove alumnae in which a majority of respondents strongly favored

keeping the college all female.

Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be

answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which

it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these

questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.

【思路点拨】

院长的观点是应该废除女校传统，开始录取男生。因为其他女校采取男女同校政策后申请数量上升。然而校友会主任反对该计划。主任认为女校教育是学院的基本特点;并且，对于刚入学的学生所做的调查表明，学校的女校形式是他们选择Grove的主要原因;另，一次对Grove校友的调查表明大多数回应者强烈支持学院保持女校形式。

Fallacies论证中的不足：

1. 因果关系问题。其他女校申请数量上升是因为采取男女同校政策吗?

2. 错误类比。即使其他女校申请数量上升是因为采取男女同校政策，但这一定适用于Grove College吗?

3. 信息不完整。对于Grove College来说，是申请数量重要还是女校的特征重要?

4. 选择性样本问题。接受调查的新生具有代表性吗?二年级学生的看法呢?

5. 回应者是否具有代表性。接受调查的学生和校友是否都是些更倾向于支持女校的学生和校友?

6. 考虑问题不全面。男女同校政策能否吸引到其他学生?

7. 未全面衡量优缺点。男女同校的优点是什么?

点击查看参考范文

除了Argument机经，更有Issue机经精彩内容 点击查看

GRE机经为易伯华GRE频道独家原创gre.yibohua.con，转载请以超链接形式标注本文出处，并附上此申明，否则将追究法律责任。