SAT写作官方样题考生范文：Why Literature Matters（1）

北京sat培训,sat备考资料,sat网课,sat培训机构,sat保分班,sat真题

本文给大家分享SAT写作样题“Why Literature Matters”的一篇范文，本文得分1 1 1，作文题目及更多分数段范文，请点击入口。

本话题各分数段范文汇总及解读，请点击进入

Sample 1 Scores: 1/1/1

Dana Gioia builds an argument designed and

commissioned by the National Endowment for the Arts. Americans declined for

eight of the nine major forms that are measured. College attendance ballooned,

and access to information increased enormously.

Some of the younger kids showed in the arts and espically literature actually

diminished. The significane of reading has become a persistent theme in the

business world. The magazine issue of Wired, for example, sketches a new set of

mental skill and habits proper to the 21st century, aptitudes deadely literally

in character: not “linear, logical, and analytical talents.”

Reading is not timeless universal capability.

This paper scored a 1/1/1.

Reading—1: This response demonstrates little comprehension of Gioia’s text.

The response is almost entirely composed of ideas and phrases taken directly

from the passage. Although the writer does demonstrate that the writer has read

the passage by referring to the Wired article (the writer conveys that employers

are looking for aptitudes deadely literally in character: not “linear, logical,

and analytical talents”) and including a notable point in the passage (Reading

is not [a] timeless universal capability), there is very little evidence that

the writer actually understands Gioia’s main argument, and the response is

limited to presenting seemingly randomly chosen details from the passage.

Overall, this response demonstrates inadequate reading comprehension.

Analysis—1: The writer demonstrates no real understanding of the analytical

task and offers no discernible analysis of the source text. The writer does not

describe Gioia’s use of evidence, reasoning, or stylistic or persuasive

elements, nor does the writer attempt to explain the importance of these

elements to Gioia’s argument. The brief response is largely comprised of ideas

and phrases taken directly from the passage. Overall, this response demonstrates

inadequate analysis.

Writing—1: This response demonstrates little cohesion and insufficient skill

in the use and control of language. The writer includes no clear central claim

or controlling idea and instead jumps into repeating ideas and phrases from the

passage. There is no real organization or progression of ideas, either in

paragraphs or in the essay as a whole. Furthermore, there is little to no

evidence of the writer’s own writing ability since most of the response is taken

directly from Gioia’s text. Overall, this response demonstrates inadequate

control of language and writing skill.