SAT写作官方样题考生范文：Why Literature Matters（8）

北京sat培训,sat备考资料,sat网课,sat培训机构,sat保分班,sat真题

本文给大家分享SAT写作样题“Why Literature Matters”的一篇范文，本文得分4 3 4，作文题目及更多分数段范文，请点击入口。

本话题各分数段范文汇总及解读，请点击进入

Sample 8 Scores: 4/3/4

In the article, “Why Literature Matters” by Dana Gioia, Gioia makes an

argument claiming that the levels of interest young Americans have shown in art

in recent years have declined and that this trend is a severe problem with broad

consequences. Strategies Gioia employs to support his argument include citation

of compelling polls, reports made by prominent organizations that have issued

studies, and a quotation from a prominent author. Gioia’s overall purpose in

writing this article appears to be to draw attention towards shortcomings in

American participation in the arts. His primary audience would be the American

public in general with a significant focus on millenials.

In his introduction paragraph, Gioia employs a distinct contrast with several

listed positive changes in American life such as increased college attendance

and increases in income, with the focus of his article: the fact that the

interest young Americans show in art has declined. This tool is utilized to

establish an emphasis on his primary point by highlighting it as a negative

development relative to other changes in American life. This literary tool

serves a strong purpose by acting as a vehicle to draw the audience into the

principle issue addressed by the writing.

In paragraph 5, Gioia utilizes a synergistic reference to two separate

sources of information that serves to provide a stronger compilation of support

for his main topic. By citing a quotation from author Daniel Pinks who states,

that the talents individuals require for success in the 21st Century are not,

“linear, logical, analytic talents,” but ones that provide, “the ability to

create artistic and emotional beauty, to detect patterns and opportunities,” and

“to craft a satisfying narrative,” Gioia is able to build his point with the

agreement of a respected individual. He then immediately follows with a

statement that business leaders like to see, “imagination, creativity, and

higher order thinking” as qualities for individuals in management positions.

This dual utilization of claims from two separate sources conveys to Gioia’s

audience the sense that the skills built through immersion in the arts are vital

to succeeding in the modern workplace which aids in logically leading his

audience to the conclusion that a loss of experience with the arts may

foreshadow troubling results.

In paragraph 6, Gioia follows up on the point established in paragraph 5 by

introducing a negative example of the consequences of loss of the arts with a

focus on literacy. Gioia cites a 2001 poll on the National Association of

American Manufactures stating stating that poor reading skills ranked second

among its employees surveyed for skill deficiencies while 38% of employees

believed local schools inadequately taught reading comprehension. Gioias

presentation of a numerical statistic based on a major employer adds significant

logical weight to his argument by providing an example of the effects of a

deficit in experience with art and literature. This may effect his audience by

providing a more accurrate depiction of the true problems caused by

disconnection with arts while possibly choosing an example they could personally

relate to.

Overall, Gioia provides an strong logical argument that disconnection with

the arts is troubling for America. He employs strong logical connections and

establishes real-world foundations for his point.

This paper scored a 4/3/4.

Reading—4: This response demonstrates thorough comprehension of the source

text and illustrates an understanding of the interrelation between the central

idea and important details in Gioia’s piece. The writer accurately paraphrases

the central idea of Gioia’s text (the levels of interest young Americans have

shown in art in recent years have declined and that this trend is a severe

problem with broad consequences). The writer then exhibits an understanding of

the details in Gioia’s text and how they work together to convey the main point

(Gioia is able to build his point; He then immediately follows with...; In

paragraph 6, Gioia follows up on the point established in paragraph 5...). The

response is also free of errors of fact or interpretation. Overall, this

response demonstrates advanced reading comprehension.

Analysis—3: The response demonstrates good understanding of the analytical

task by offering an effective analysis of the source text. The writer is able to

move past simple identification of and assertions about the analytical elements

in Gioia’s text to discuss how these elements contribute to Gioia’s argument.

For example, the writer identifies the distinct contrast that Gioia establishes

early in the passage between positive changes in American life and the fact that

the interest young Americans show in art has declined. The writer then explains

that Gioia uses this contrast to establish an emphasis on his primary point by

highlighting it as a negative development. The writer then competently evaluates

the effect of this element of Gioia’s text by explaining that this literary tool

serves a strong purpose by acting as a vehicle to draw the audience into the

principle issue addressed by the writing. This pattern of effective analysis

continues throughout the remainder of the response and indicates proficient

analytical skill. The writer clearly can delineate and evaluate the impact of

Gioia’s argumentative moves, but this analysis lacks the thoroughness and

completeness needed to receive a higher score. For example, there is no

indication of how or why these moves are effective.

Writing—4: The writer demonstrates highly effective use and command of

language in this cohesive response. The response includes a precise central

claim (Strategies Gioia employs to support his argument include citation of

compelling polls, reports made by prominent organizations that have issued

studies, and a quotation from a prominent author). The skillful introduction

establishes the framework for the writer’s organizational structure, which is

followed throughout the response. Although the subsequent discussion is not laid

out as explicitly as the simple three-pronged thesis suggests, each body

paragraph remains on-topic and demonstrates a deliberate progression of ideas,

and the response as a whole remains focused and cohesive. The response contains

many examples of sophisticated sentence structure, notable vocabulary, and

precise word choice (This dual utilization of claims from two separate sources

conveys to Gioia’s audience the sense that the skills built through immersion in

the arts are vital to succeeding in the modern workplace which aids in logically

leading his audience to the conclusion that a loss of experience with the arts

may foreshadow troubling results). Overall, this response demonstrates advanced

writing ability.