SAT写作官方样题考生范文：Why Literature Matters（6）

北京sat培训,sat备考资料,sat网课,sat培训机构,sat保分班,sat真题

本文给大家分享SAT写作样题“Why Literature Matters”的一篇范文，本文得分3 3 4，作文题目及更多分数段范文，请点击入口。

本话题各分数段范文汇总及解读，请点击进入

Sample 6 Scores: 3/3/4

Stepping outside, a person in the United States can instantly see how

prevalent a role technology has in our lives. From the smart phones that connect

people globally trough a few touches on the screen, to the airplanes roaring

across the sky, the astounding capabilities and convenience that technology

offers is unmatched. In “Why literature matters”, an article from the New York

Times Corporation by Dana Gioia, Gioia explores how living in the high-tech 21st

century has unfortunately deteriorated the percentage of Americans who read

literature. Gioia is able to sway his audience to devote more time to the simple

task of reading works of intellectual value through fearful diction and

compelling consequences associated with being illiterate.

Through his article, Gioia implements fearful diction to express his concern

that America’s future is in the hands of those who are less informed and

comprehending of situations; economic and social. By labeling the diminished

percentage of those who read as “worrisome” and “troubling” Gioia is able to

convey the negativity of the lack of literacy. Upon reading the article, and

mulling over how Gioia feels about America’s current reading levels, a reader is

inclined to acknowledge that illiteracy is detrimental to American society and

something that needs to be repaired; the point Gioia was trying to impose.

Also in the article, Gioia reveals to the audience the consequences of this

trend. By exposing the domino effect of illiteracy into other large aspects of

American society such as electing leaders, and the business world, Gioia

succeeds in alarming the audience to the seriousness of the issue and instilling

a sense of urgency to mend the problem. Although the facts alone are eye-opening

to any reader, by backing the facts up with big name organizations like “The

National Association of Manufacturers” and the “National Conference of State

Legislatures”, Gioia is able to cement his argument and therefore be more

empowered in persuading his audience on the importance of reading.

Lastly, Gioia’s target audience plays a major role in achieving the goal to

propel his argument into a plan of action. Writing for the New York Times, Gioia

can likely expect his audience to be educated and even have some influence in

American society. By appealing his argument to people who are in control of

others who are a part of the illiterate population, Gioia can put faith into the

hope that his audience will make the problem he presented a solution. An example

of this would be if a school board official were to read his article, and then

decided the matter to be so pressing that he/she took the necessary actions to

propose rules for his/her respective school district. Due to the profound impact

Gioia’s article can have on a large quality of Americans, his argument is

strengthened exponentially.

Ultimately, Gioia is able to relay a strong and persuasive argument regarding

the decline of Americans reading and why it needs to be fixed through concerned

word choice, compelling consequences, and masterfully writing to inspire a

specific audience.

This paper scored a 3/3/4.

Reading—3: This response demonstrates effective comprehension of the source

text in terms of both the central ideas and important details in Gioia’s piece.

The writer accurately paraphrases the main idea of Gioia’s text (living in the

high-tech 21stcentury has unfortunately deteriorated the percentage of Americans

who read literature). The writer also includes important details from the text

that illustrate an effective comprehension of the passage, such as when the

writer summarizes the consequences of the decrease in reading on American

society (the domino effect of illiteracy into other large aspects of American

society such as electing leaders, and the business world). The response is free

from errors of fact and interpretation, and the writer’s ability to paraphrase

accurately the main ideas and supporting details of Gioia’s piece indicate

proficient reading comprehension.

Analysis—3: The response offers an effective analysis of the source text,

demonstrating a proficient understanding of the analytical task. In the second

body paragraph, for example, the writer effectively analyzes Gioia’s use of what

the writer callsfearful diction, coming to the conclusion that Upon reading the

article, and mulling over how Gioia feels about America’s current reading

levels, a reader is inclined to acknowledge that illiteracy is detrimental to

American society and something that needs to be repaired. The writer is thus

able to articulate the effect of Gioia’s diction on his audience, signaling an

understanding of the analytical task. This effective analysis continues when the

writer discusses Gioia’s use of eye-openingfacts about the consequences of the

decline in reading and when the writer suggests the potential effect of Gioia’s

argument on his target audience via a hypothetical scenario (By appealing his

argument to people who are in control of others...Gioia can put faith into the

hope that his audience will make the problem he presented a solution. An example

of this would be if a school board official were to read his article, and

thentook the necessary actions). Although providing this scenario indicates

strong analytical skill on the part of the writer, the discussion is elaborated

only enough to demonstrate proficiency and does not demonstrate the thoroughness

and insightfulness expected at the advanced level.

Writing—4: This response is cohesive and demonstrates highly effective use

and control of language. The writer presents a generally skillful introduction,

opening with a brief narrative about the pervasiveness of technology in

twenty-first-century life before summarizing the passage and then providing a

thoughtful central claim: Gioia is able to sway his audience to devote more time

to the simple task of reading works of intellectual value through fearful

diction and compelling consequences associated with being illiterate. The writer

demonstrates precise, original word choice and phrases throughout the response

(astounding capabilities, the domino effect, mulling over, instilling a sense of

urgency, strengthened exponentially). The body paragraphs are each tightly

focused and are deliberately structured to advance the writer’s analysis of

Gioia’s use of diction,consequences, and audience. The response maintains a

formal style and objective tone, contains clear transitions (also,

lastly,ultimately) to guide the reader, and ends with a concise and precise

summary conclusion (Ultimately, Gioia is able to relay a strong and persuasive

argument regarding the decline of Americans reading and why it needs to be fixed

through concerned word choice, compelling consequences, and masterfully writing

to inspire a specific audience). Overall, this response demonstrates advanced

writing.