美国本土高中生观点型写作范文赏析--Don't Touch Our Guns​

北京sat培训,sat备考资料,sat网课,sat培训机构,sat保分班,sat真题

本文就美国宪法第二修正案规定：“人民持有和携带武器的权利，不得侵犯”这样的条例提出了自己的想法。这是一篇来自美国高中生的文章，从本文能看出美国高中生的思维逻辑。

美国本土高中生观点题型写作范文汇总，点击进入

Don't Touch Our Guns

The 2nd Amendment of the constitution states, “the right of the people to

keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (The Constitution of the United

States). Citizens of the United States are debating whether or not to have more

control over guns to prevent school shootings. Restricting the right to keep and

bear arms will not prevent school shootings but restricts individual freedom. In

the novella Anthem by Ayn Rand, the author focuses on the importance of the

rights of an individual. The freedom of the individual is more important than

the needs of the group.

The opposing view believes that gun control will prevent unnecessary school

shootings. They believe that putting restrictions on those who buy guns to

“prevent casually motivated gun acquisition by convicted criminals and other

high-risk persons who are less powerfully motivated than mass killers to get

guns regardless of the obstacles” (Jacobs). Background checks on a person who

wants to buy a gun restricts their freedom. The other side also believes gun

control will reduce the amount of shootings. Logically, the less guns there are,

the less shootings there would be but statistically, “Gun ownership does not

correlate with increased violence. For example, the rate of gun ownership is

higher in rural areas than in urban areas, but the murder rate is higher in

urban areas” (Malcolm and Marshall). There are more guns in rural areas yet less

crime. In urban areas, there is less gun ownership but there is a higher crime

rate. It would make sense that no guns would mean less shootings, but

realistically it makes an area more dangerous. Taking away the right to obtain

guns will make society more dangerous.

Gun control laws will not prevent shootings, it will actually increase the

chances of a school shooting. The Second Amendment not only protects individual

freedom, but it also serves “to enable American citizens to defend themselves

against violent criminals” (Malcolm and Marshall). Guns serve as a form of self

defense, but taking away this right would lead to more violence. Studies have

shown that the more gun control laws there are, the more dangerous the city is.

Cities like Washington D.C. that “have very strict gun control laws, should be

among the safest places to live rather than among the most dangerous” (Malcolm

and Marshall). Washington D.C. would be the most safe area in the country

because of the laws they have, but gun control laws do not decrease violence.

The reason being is that guns provide a method of self defense. For instance, if

two people in a room are both aiming guns at each other, neither will pull the

trigger knowing the other person could do so as well, and both will be injured

or killed. However, if two people in a room and only one has a gun, the person

with the gun has the upperhand. While gun ownership has doubled, “Americans are

safer today from violent crime, including gun homicide, than they have been at

any time since the mid-1960s”. Guns are used for protection and have the power

to stop criminals and killings. Another instance of how guns provide a safer

environment would be if more guns were held in schools. A criminal would not

come into a school knowing if they were to point a gun at a teacher or class, a

security guard or someone who has proper training could threaten the criminal

back. Neither person would have more power than the other if both had a gun.

Even if the criminal is to shoot, the person protecting the class would shoot

back, and save the lives of others in the building. There has been many

instances of when “mass shooters have been stopped before they could continue

their mayhem by ordinary citizens with lawfully possessed firearms” (Malcolm and

Marshall). People have stopped criminals with a gun, and guns should continue to

serve as a form of self defense. Guns will prevent school shootings from

happening or being stopped completely, not gun laws.

Gun control is put into place to benefit the needs of the group rather than

the freedom of an individual. However, in the United States, freedom of a

citizen is the most important aspect of the country. The Second Amendment is a

natural right of a US citizen and is the “constitutional right to keep and bear

arms [which] is an individual right that is fundamental to a free society”

(Malcolm and Marshall). It is a fact that the United States is the most free

country in the whole world and citizens should be able to have their freedom.

However, taking away an individual’s right that has been in place since the

beginning of this country goes against that freedom. According to “Gun Control”,

a negative side to gun control is, “Gun ownership is an American tradition older

than the country itself and is protected by the Second Amendment; more gun

control laws would infringe upon the right to bear arms”. Not only does gun

control go against the rights of an individual, but it goes against a right that

has been in place for many years. The 2nd Amendment is apart of the Bill of

Rights, which was the first set of rights an individual had at the start of the

country. Before the United States developed, England had an absolute monarch,

which means power is in the hands of one person. John Locke took a stance upon

fighting for natural rights and spoke up in his book Second Treatise of

Government, “man was born with a right to perfect freedom, and with an

uncontrolled enjoyment of all the rights and privileges of the law of nature,

equally with any other man or men in the world”. John Locke goes on to further

explain that a man is born equal, and as long as he lives, he has to right to

his own personal life, liberty, and possessions, and no one can take that away

from him or any person. The United States was started from the victory of a

fight for freedom, and our freedom today should not be taken away. Government

taking away the right to keep and bear arms is taking away our individual

freedom.

The problems of society cannot always be resolved with government

interference. School shootings can not be prevented with control of the

government. According to “Gun Control Won’t Prevent School Shootings”, “Policy

makers should not just do something to alleviate our sense of urgent

responsibility without due consideration of its effects”. Government officials

sometimes feel the need to immediately react upon the problems like mass

shootings without researching facts and statistics. Officials believe they are

benefitting the needs of America by controlling guns, however their decisions do

not benefit anyone. Anthem shows how government interference is not always

effective. The lawmakers of the society is The Council, who makes all the

decisions for the people thinking they are making the society equal to benefit

needs of the society as a whole. Before the citizens go to bed, they raise their

right arm and say “We are nothing. Mankind is all. By the grace of our brothers

are we allowed our lives. We exist through, by and for our brothers who are the

State. Amen” (Rand, 21). The Council makes the people recognize that an

individuality is not effective nor important, but working together as a whole

will make the society work. However, the main character, Equality 7-252, strives

for his own individual freedom rather than the benefit of the people in his

society. Individuality allows for a person’s creativity, self thinking, and

discovery of what is good for themselves and the world, but the Council thinks

it leads to destruction of the whole group. The Council decides the jobs of each

member of society, and knowing that Equality naturally strives for

individuality, he would have the ability to discover things of the past,

including electricity. They do not give him the job he has potential for which

is the Scholars. Equality 7-252 is drawn to individuality and goes against the

Council’s orders, and ends up discovering electricity anyway. The Council tried

to interfere with a person’s individuality, and it was not effective, for

Equality 7-252 discovered his true self in the end. When government interferes

with the individual freedom of a person, it does not help the society.

Gun control is not effective in terms of the needs of the group and freedom

of the individual. While the opposing view still thinks gun control will

decrease school shootings, the other side believes it increases the chances.

Restricting the right to keep and bear arms will not prevent school shootings,

but restricts individual freedom. The right to keep and bear arms is a US

citizen right that has been with us since the start of the country and it

decreases violence and murder. Problems of the country, like school shootings,

will not always be solved with the help of government. Gun control kills, not

guns.

重点词汇短语：

debate 讨论，争论

shoot 这里翻译成枪击比较好

restrict 限制

acquisition 采集

casually 随意地

self defense 自我防守

interference 干扰

alleviate 缓解

potential 潜力