【SAT范文】6月4日亚太新SAT考试写作范文赏析

北京sat培训,sat备考资料,sat网课,sat培训机构,sat保分班,sat真题

本次考试作文A Carbon Tax Beats a Vacuum

Ban来自美国新闻网opinion版块2014年1月23日发表的一篇文章。作者认为通过对碳排放收税是比禁止一些类型的真空吸尘器的使用更好的策略。文章多讨论的话题属于环保主题，环保话题这样的世界性热门话题是最容易被选择作为分析文章来考察的。

SAT写作写作阅读原文：http://sat.yibohua.con/xiezuo46210.html

写作例文：

To the extent that Sita Slavov presented a strong and convincing argument

claiming that the practice of carbon tax charge is a better policy compared with

a pure Vacuum Ban, the author has managed to achieve so by using both

psychological as well as semi scholarly sources to support her argument, and by

listing a number of real-life examples to gain an echo from her audiences in an

empirical way.These strategies suggest that Sita Slavov structured her

persuasion by adopting both pure-rational and emotional means.

Starting from analyzing the big picture, the methodology and structure that

Slavov adopted to construct her think piece is fairly creative. To review her

article from a macro prospective, the author did not start to pose out her own

argument until the last two paragraphs. As a matter of fact, Slavov used a

significant length of lines to introduce her readers the background knowledge as

well as relevant disputes around the issue at present. In doing so, Slavov could

not only offer her readers’ a comprehensive abstract of the issue’s core but

could also do foreshadowing for her personal arguments as follow----since the

present disputes make sense respectively while cannot pose out a reasonable

evaluation of the ban policy, a third party train of thought is necessitated,

hence Slavov used these introductory sections as a perfect guiding stone for her

body partand conclusion. Moreover, such high percentile of introductory length

would inspire her readers’ brown study on the issue’s essence by themselves

rather than merely ponder over current disputes.

From a comparatively micro point of view, the author adopted both

rhetorical as wellas academic strategies to frame her paragraphs.

Firstly, Sita Slavov took a quite prominent political prospective, mainly

because she is trying to comment on the core and influence of an EU policy.

Although thepolicy itself aims to improve human environment and is hence

categorized as an environmental public policy, the author didn’t try to take an

environmental stand of point and construct her piece into academic. Rather, she

attempted to criticize the authority of the European Union’s bureaucratic

legislation itself. In doing so, she has successfully managed to interpret the

core of the issue into “the government’s violation towards people’s freedom of

choice inconsumptions” rather than “if the vacuum ban policy itself would be

effective and environmental friendly”. In doing so, Sita Slavov further took an

anthropological prospective to convince her readers that the vacuum ban policy

is deeply lack of legitimacy. Specifically, the author used two constant

rhetorical questions to emphasize on the government’s “lack of legitimacy” and

accuse the government of “taking intrusion into even the most minute of personal

decisions”. By using such methodologies, Sita Slavov could successfully evoke

her readers’ aversion towards the authority’s behavior and would hence turn to

support his argument.

Moreover, to strengthen her demonstrations, the author quoted a

comparatively largeamount of evidence. Specifically, in the second paragraph,

Sita Slavov mainly referenced semi scholarly data and statistics to claim why

the negative influence of EU’s public policy would be so profound. Meanwhile, in

the third paragraph, Sita intended to use real life evidence to convey the

message that such policy is absurd in practice. The style of language, by

itself, has made Slavov’s think piece into a more easy to read format, and thus

would successfully attract the her audiences’ interests of reading.

Though with her great success in persuasion, Slavov has also made a few

errors interms of reasoning. For example, she didn’t manage to make intelligent

and relevant criticisms of the authority’s public policy. Rather, he intended to

delude her readers with petty and wild accusations against the government while

didn’t provide his audiences enough scholarly evidences and sources to argue

against the rationality and scientific necessity of the policy as well as its

influence.

传送门

新SAT阅读 6大考试技巧：http://sat.yibohua.con/yuedu47329.html

可汗学院新SAT考试练习题资料下载：http://sat.yibohua.con/satziliao47730.html

新SAT阅读 考试官方OG题型解析汇总：http://sat.yibohua.con/yuedu47372.html