SAT写作官方样题考生范文：Why Literature Matters（4）

北京sat培训,sat备考资料,sat网课,sat培训机构,sat保分班,sat真题

本文给大家分享SAT写作样题“Why Literature Matters”的一篇范文，本文得分3 3 3，作文题目及更多分数段范文，请点击入口。

本话题各分数段范文汇总及解读，请点击进入

Sample 4 Scores: 3/3/3

In Dana Gioia’s, “Why Literature Matters”, he uses comparisons as well as

facts and statistics to assert why “advanced literacy is a specific intellectual

skill and social habit that depends on a great many educational, cultural, and

economic factors.”

Gioia uses study-based statistics to support his thesis: “While income rose

to unforseen levels, college attendance ballooned, and access to information

increased enormously, the interest young Americans showed in the arts—and

especially literature—actually diminished.” Gioia states that literary readers

are more “civically engaged than non readers” and that they are two to four

times more likely to participate in charity work, visit museum, or attend a

sporting event. Of course, these are all positive characteristics for a person

to have. Using this study-based fact, Gioia aims to alert people to the personal

benefits that come with reading regularly. Also, Gioia lists traits that

employers may desire in a potential employee such as: imagination, creativity

and higher-order thinking. By doing this Gioia sends a message that having

literary knowledge goes beyond literature and that it can be helpful in a

workplace environment.

Gioia also uses comparisons between people who don’t read and people who do.

He states that poor reading skills ranked second among hourly workers and that

38 percent of employers complained that local schools inadequately taught

reading comprehension. Those statements may accomplish two things: scare any

parent reading this passage in that their child may not be getting a good

education, and inspire his audience to not be one of the people that their

employer is displeased with. Just from that statement, Gioia has captured the

attention of parents and any other individual that is insecure about their

literary skills as well.

In conclusion, Gioia uses study-based statistics as factual proof to portray

to his audience how America’s literary education is slowly failing. Gioia also

uses comparison and contrast to depict to his audience what a desirable literary

education provides as well as what the lack of literary education can result

in.

This paper scored a 3/3/3.

Reading—3: This response demonstrates effective comprehension of the source

text by illustrating proficient understanding of the central ideas and important

details in Gioia’s piece. The writer appropriately uses textual evidence in the

form of direct quotations to convey the central idea in the text (“....the

interest young Americans showed in the arts—and especially literature—actually

diminished”). Furthermore, the writer accurately paraphrases some of the

important details that support Gioia’s main ideas (Also, Gioia lists traits that

employers may desire in a potential employee such as: imagination, creativity

and higher-order thinking). The writer’s understanding is further demonstrated

throughout the remainder of the essay. In the concluding paragraph, for example,

the writer succinctly summarizes the main point of the passage (America’s

literary education is slowly failing) and aptly interprets Gioia’s goal in

writing: to depict what a desirable literary education provides as well as what

the lack of literary education can result in. The response is free of errors of

fact and interpretation, and, on the whole, demonstrates proficient reading

comprehension.

Analysis—3: This response offers an effective analysis of Gioia’s argument,

demonstrating proficient understanding of the analytical task. Following the

basic thesis that Gioia uses comparisons as well as facts and statistics to

assert why “advanced literacy is a specific intellectual skill and social habit

that depends on a great many educational, cultural, and economic factors,” the

writer competently evaluates these elements of Gioia’s text. In the second body

paragraph, for example, the writer notes that Gioia’s comparison of readers and

nonreaders may accomplish two things: scare any parent and inspire his audience.

In this example, the writer explains the effect of Gioia’s argument on the

reader and, in so doing, demonstrates an understanding of how the comparison

serves Gioia’s argument. Although the writer occasionally provides

unsubstantiated assertions (Of course, these are all positive characteristics

for a person to have; Just from that statement, Gioia has captured the attention

of parents), this does not substantially detract from what is overall a

proficient analysis of how Gioia builds and structures his argument.

Writing—3: This response is mostly cohesive and demonstrates effective use of

language. Although the introduction is only one sentence long, it contains a

clear central claim (Gioia uses comparisons as well as facts and statistics to

assert why “advanced literacy is a specific intellectual skill and social

habit...”). The essay follows this basic structure, albeit in reverse order: the

first body paragraph is centered on Gioia’s use of study-based statistics and

facts (Gioia states that literary readers are more “civically engaged than non

readers” and that they are two to four times more likely to participate in

charity work), while the second body paragraph is focused on Gioia’s use of

comparisons in the passage, such as his comparison between people who don’t read

and people who do. There is a clearly signaled conclusion, which summarizes both

the main ideas of Gioia’s passage and the writer’s preceding analysis. Each

paragraph in the response remains on-topic and demonstrates a clear progression

of ideas. The response also provides a variety of sentence structures and

precise word choice and is free of significant language errors. Overall, this

response demonstrates proficient writing.