2020年10月10日|托福独立写作真题解析

托福写作,托福写作,托福写作测试,托福写作培训,托福写作课程,易伯华教育

2023年10月10日|托福独立写作真题解析

10月10日

托福独立写作

“When you give money to the charitable organizations, would you prefer to

choose how the donation will be used (for example, donate money on food, service

or advertisement for organizations) or leave the decision to the

organizations?”

题目破解：又一次考到了慈善话题，题型变成了对比。既然是对比题就要注意两个对比主体之间的差异性从而进行写作。本文将用三个主体段来表现不同形式的对比。

Introduction

本文略

Body

The first major reason lies in the professionalism in doing charity work.

Consisted by experts majored in philanthropy, the agents are capable to cover

all the trivial tasks in helping the miserable. What matters most are where and

how to offer the special money, both rather vexing. Therefore, staffs with

abundant working experience in those establishments are on top of these issues,

ensuring the effective aid in relieving the problems. The opposite is

individuals in this field. When encountering the huge amount of money, many

would be in a mess without enough energy to make the detailed plan. It always

comes out that the whole project will be a failure.【用讲道理的方式进行对比】The celebrity

Hanhong is the best example. Instead of hiring experts to manage the money from

donors, she decided to be self-centered in the helping events. What she did not

expect was theoverwhelming workload in the charity. Not only were the candidates

on helping list hard to contact, but also the processes during the assisting

were countless to track. She only ended up with sacrificing her health in

dealing the issues, which is totally unnecessary if the specialized institutes

were engaged.【附加一个契合文章的小例子】

Ø 解决对比题的方案是找出不同点

Also, through officials the bailout projects deem to be more balanced.

Private helpers’ focus may give to the field they concerned most especially the

heated topics like rural education or empty nesters. Unlike them, the officials

take all aspects into consideration and thus the funs can beallocated in an even

way rather than disproportionate. Recently, the social media has propagandized

the scarcity of primary school teachers in a remote village, which has earned

much attention and altruistic money from individuals. However, the other issues

are still in urgent need of help like the refugees from war zone or starving

children, which to some extent are severer but seldom draw the public’s

attention or the funds.【区别于上一段这里用一个抽象的例子】

同样是对比的情况下，可以通过例子的不同加以区分

Furthermore, some may oppose the official management in saying that the

institutions are notorious for corruption or pocketing public money. It must be

clarified that this only happen to those without supervision and who can give a

confirmation to private funding? 【用反问句甩个锅，之前都是比不同，这里比一个相同】The similar incidents

would emerge even be more under the same bug. The settlement roots in the

authority control not passing the buck to private person-oriented charity.

出自己论述可能有漏洞的地方及时补充论证