GRE写作Issue部分精品素材分享之决策与自由意志

北京GRE培训,GRE备考资料,GRE网课,GRE培训机构,GRE保分班,GRE真题,GRE课程

想要在GRE作文部分的考试中写出优秀的文章，论据素材是重要的一环。好的论据不仅能帮助你支撑观点，加强说服力，还能体现出考生在阅读量上的积累和深厚扎实的语言功底基础。特别是ISSUE作文，更是需要大量好素材作为储备，才能保证考生无论遭遇那种题目，都能游刃有余地完成一篇高分作文的写作。小编为大家整理了GRE

ISSUE作文各类题目的精品优质素材，一起来看吧。

社会学习理论

Social learning theories propose that people internalize moral codes more

through the process of socialization—learning behaviors through interaction with

others—rather than through a stage-by-stage development process. Specifically,

social learning theorists maintain a young person learns how to behave based on

how elders (primarily parent figures) respond to the person‟s violations of and

compliance with rules. Rewards for acceptable behavior and sanctions (penalties)

for transgressions indicate what appropriate behaviors are.

决策的概念

Decision making is the cognitive process leading to the selection of a course

of action among several alternatives. Every decision making process produces a

final choice. It can be an action or an opinion. It begins when we need to do

something but know not what. Therefore, decision making is a reasoning process

which can be rational or irrational, can be based on explicit assumptions or

tacit assumptions.

structured rational decision making is an important part of all science-based

professions, where specialists apply their knowledge in a given area to making

informed decisions. For example, medical decision making often involves making a

diagnosis and selecting an appropriate treatment. Some research using

naturalistic methods shows, however, that in situations with higher time

pressure, higher stakes, or increased ambiguities, experts use intuitive

decision making rather than structured approaches, following a recognition

primed decision approach to fit a set of indicators into the expert‟s experience

and immediately arrive at a satisfactory course of action without weighing

alternatives.

自由意志

The question of free will is whether, and in what sense, rational agents

exercise control over their actions and decisions. Addressing this question

requires understanding the relationship between freedom and cause, and

determining whether the laws of nature are causally deterministic. The various

philosophical positions taken differ on whether all events are determined or

not—determinism versus indeterminism—and also on whether freedom can coexist

with determinism or not—compatibilism versus incompatibilism. So, for instance,

hard determinists argue that the universe is deterministic, and that this makes

free will impossible.

The principle of free will has religious, ethical, and scientific

implications. For example, in the religious realm, free will may imply that an

omnipotent divinity does not assert its power over individual will and choices.

In ethics, it may imply that individuals can be held morally accountable for

their actions. In the scientific realm, it may imply that the actions of the

body, including the brain and the mind, are not wholly determined by physical

causality. The question of free will has been a central issue since the

beginning of philosophical thought.

真正的自由及其两大要素

Real Freedom is a concept of freedom that expands upon notions of negative

freedom by incorporating not simply institutional or other constraints on a

person‟s choices, but also the requirements of physical reality, resources and

personal capacity. To have real freedom, an individual must:

1. Not be prevented from acting on his/her will (i.e. he/she must have

traditional negative freedom); and

2. Possess the resources or capacities actually to carry out his/her

will.

Real freedom expands on negative freedom by adding the idea of actually being

able to exercise a capacity or resource in the absence of constraint; but does

not go as far as some ideas of positive freedom, by refraining from appeal to

self-government by a real, best, or higher self.