【易伯华独家】雅思阅读全真模考题:幸福决策论
北京雅思培训,雅思备考资料,雅思网课,雅思培训机构,雅思保分班,雅思真题,雅思课程
易伯华雅思名师讲堂从今天开始和大家分享一系列阅读仿真模拟题,可以说与雅思真题99%相似,是烤鸭在剑桥雅思之余的良好调剂品。烤鸭们可以先自己试着做一做,做完之后可以对下答案,再看看易伯华名师的悉心讲解。本篇阅读的标题:幸福决策论。
A
Americans today choose among more options
in more options in more parts of life than has ever been possible before. To
an extent, the opportunity to choose enhances our lives. It is only logical
to think that if some choice is good, more is better; people who care about
having infinite options will benefit from them, and those who do not can
always just ignore the 273 versions of cereal they have never tried. Yet
recent research strongly suggests that, psychologically, this assumption is
wrong. Although some choice is undoubtedly better than none, more is not
always better than less.
B
Recent research offers insight into why
many people end up unhappy rather than pleased when their options expand. We
began by making a distinction between "maximizers" (those who
always aim to make the best possible choice) and "satisficers"
(those who aim for "good enough," whether or not better selections
might be out there).
C
In particular, we composed a set of
statements- the Maximization Scale—to diagnose people's propensity to
maximize. Then we had several thousand people rate themselves from 1 to 7
(from "completely disagree" to "completely agree) on such
statements as "I never settle for second best." We also evaluated
their sense, of satisfaction with their decisions. We did not define a sharp
cutoff to separate maximizers from satisficers, but in general, we think of
individuals whose average scores are higher than 4 (the scale's midpoint) as
maximizers and those whose scores are lower than the midpoint as satisficers.
People who score highest on the test—the greatest maximisers—engage in more
product comparisons than the lowest scorers, both before and after they make
purchasing decisions, and they take longer to decide what to buy. When
satisficers find an item that meets their standards, they stop looking. But maximizers
exert enormous effort reading labels, checking out consumer magazines and
trying new products. They also spend more time comparing their purchasing
decisions with those of others.
D
We found that the greatest maximizers are
the least happy with the fruits of their efforts. When they compare
themselves with others, they get little pleasure from finding out that they
did better and substantial dissatisfaction from finding out that they did
worse. They are more prone to experiencing regret after a purchase, and if
their acquisition disappoints them, their sense of well-being takes longer to
recover. They also tend to brood or ruminate more than satisficers do.
E
Does it follow that maximizers are less
happy in general than satisficers? We tested this by having people fill out a
variety of questionnaires known to be reliable indicators of well-being. As
might be expected, individuals with high maximization scores experienced less
satisfaction with life and were less happy, less optimistic and more
depressed than people with low maximization scores. Indeed, those with extreme
maximization ratings had depression scores that placed them in the borderline
clinical range.
F
Several factors explain why more choice is
not always better than less, especially for maximizers. High among these arc
"opportunity costs." The quality of any given option cannot be
assessed in isolation from its alternatives. One of the “costs” of making a
selection is losing the opportunities that a different option would have
afforded. Thus an opportunity cost of vacationing on the beach in Cape Cod
might be missing the fabulous restaurants in the Napa Valley. EARLY
DECISION-MAKING RESEARCH by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky showed that
people respond much more strongly to losses than gains. If we assume that
opportunity costs reduce the overall desirability of the most preferred
choice, then the more alternatives there are, the deeper our sense of loss
will be and the less satisfaction we will derive from our ultimate decision.
G
The problem of opportunity costs will be
worse for a maximizer than for a satisficer. The latter's "good
enough" philosophy can survive thoughts about opportunity costs. In
addition, the "good enough" standard leads to much less searching
and inspection of alternatives than the maximizer's "best"
standard. With fewer choices under consideration, a person will have fewer
opportunity costs to subtract.
H
Just as people fed sorrow about the
opportunities they have forgone, they may also suffer regret about the option
they settle on. My colleagues and I devised a scale to measure proneness to
feeling regret, and we found that people with high sensitivity to regret are
less happy, less satisfied with life, less optimistic and more depressed than
those with low sensitivity. Not surprisingly, we also found that people with
high regret sensitivity tend to be maximizers. Indeed, we think that worry
over future regret is a major reason that individuals become maximizers. The
only way to be sure you will not regret a decision is by making the best
possible one. Unfortunately, the more options you have and the more
opportunity costs you incur, the more likely you are to experience regret.
I
In a classic demonstration of the power of sunk costs,
people were offered season subscriptions to a local theater company. Some
were offered the tickets at frill price and others at a discount. Then the
researchers simply kept track of how often the ticket purchasers actually
attended the plays over the course of the season. Full-price payers were more
likely to show up at performances than discount payers. The reason for this,
the investigators argued, was that the full-price payers would experience
more regret if they did not use the tickets because not using the more costly
tickets would constitute a bigger loss. To increase sense of happiness, We
can decide to restrict our options when the decision is not crucial. For
example, make a rule to visit no more than two stores when shopping for
clothing.
Questions 28-31
Use the
information in the passage to match the category (listed A-D) with descriptions
or deeds below. Write the appropriate letters A-D in boxes 28-31 on your answer
sheet.
A. Maximiser
B. Satisficer
C. Both
D. Neither of them
28. finish
transaction when the items match their expectation
29. buy the
most expensive things when shopping
30. consider
repeatedly until they make final decision
31. participate
in the questionnaire of the author
Questions
32-36
Do the following
statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 3?
In
boxes 32-36 on your answer sheet,
write
TRUE if the statement is true
FALSE if the statement is false
NOT
GIVEN if the information is not given in the passage
32. With
the society's advancement, more chances make our lives better and happier.
33. There
is difference of findings by different gender classification.
34. The feeling
of loss is greater than that of acquisition.
35. 'Good
enough' plays a more significant role in pursuing "best' standards of
maximizer.
36. There
are certain correlations between the "regret" people and the maximizers.
Questions
37-40
Choose the correct
letter, A, B, C, or D.
Write your answers
in boxes 37-40 on your answer sheet
37 What is the subject of this passage?
A. regret
makes people less happy
B. choices
and Well-being
C. an
interesting phenomenon
D. advices
on shopping
38 According to conclusion of questionnaires,
which of the following statement is correct?
A. maximizers
are less happy
B. state
of being optimistic is important
C. uncertain
results arc found.
D. maximizers
tend to cross bottom line
39 The experimental on theater tickets
suggested:
A. sales
are different according to each season
B. people
like to spend on the most expensive items
C. people
feel depressed if they spend their vouchers
D. people
will feel regret more when they fail to use a higher price purchase
40 What is author's suggestion on how to
increase happiness:
A. focus
the final decision
B. be
sensitive and smart
C. reduce
the choice or option
D. read
label carefully
免费1对1规划学习方法
剑桥大学&双硕士