雅思大作文政府投资类话题范文--高等教育的学费支付办法

北京雅思培训,雅思备考资料,雅思网课,雅思培训机构,雅思保分班,雅思真题,雅思课程

Task：Higher education is funded in several ways: all costs of higher education are

paid by the government; all costs are paid by the student; all costs are paid by

students with a government loan which must be repaid after graduation. What are

the benefits of these ways and which one is the best?

高等教育的经费来源是：高等教育的所有费用由政府支付;所有费用由学生支付;所有费用由学生用政府贷款支付，必须在毕业后偿还。这些方法的好处是什么，哪一个是最好的?

雅思大作文政府投资类话题范文题库，传送门

思路解析：

1.

第一种方案的好处：大学学费全部由政府承担能普及大学教育，这能让每一个年轻人都获取专业知识，技能，以及法律观念，最终能提高社会生产力，并且让社会变得更文明和守法。

2.

第二种方案的好处：大学学费完全由学生负担能限制大学的学生数量，这确保了大学教育的质量，比如说更少的师生比率，更小的班级上课，以及一个安静的校园。

3.

第三种方案的好处：提供学生学费贷款能为年轻人提供一条进入大学的途径。同时，还贷款的压力为这些年轻人提供了动力来努力学习。这样他们才能在毕业后找到好的工作来还钱。

参考范文：

Who should take the responsibility of paying for the higher education, the

government or a student? The topic lists three possible ways for this social

issue. Personally, I believe the best answer is the third one that allows a

student to borrow the loan from the government and repay it after graduation,

and my reasons will be explored as below.

The main benefit from the first plan is about the improvement of good

qualities among the public. The full payment of government for schooling fees

makes university education universally available to all individuals, both rich

and poor. That is to say, every citizen can be well educated and equipped with

professional knowledge, skills, advanced technologies, as well as the concepts

about social laws, rules and morality. With these abilities and virtues, these

graduates will enhance the social productivity, the creativity in jobs, and make

the community gentle, charitable, self-disciplined and law-abiding as well.

The second plan primarily benefits the quality of university education.

Obviously, paying for the high education at students’ own expense is an ideal

method to limit the number of students. That is to say, the atmosphere of the

campus is quiet, peaceful and safer, students can attend small-size classes

helping them keep focused on the studying, and they also can obtain instructions

from professors immediately, in terms of a small faculty-student ratio.

Lastly, the third way is beneficial for the growth of students. For one

thing, the loan from the government can eradicate the financial barriers in the

access to the university education, as well as making students away from a

concern of taking part-time job for making money in college life. For another,

the stress of repaying the loan drives them to make most efforts in studying,

because this is the only way for them to get good jobs with decent salaries in

the future which enable them to pay the money back after graduation.

In my view, the third plan is the best of all, for the reason that it not

only combines merits of two former ways, but also motivates students to study

and work hard for the repayment. In comparison, there are some demerits from the

first and second plans. For example, in terms of the fact that total costs of

all universities are incredibly high, the full payment of the government would

lead to a shortage of budgets on other social problems, like public health care

and environment pollution. Oppositely, if students are asked to pay for all fees

of high-level education, many of them will give it up and be uneducated.

Consequently, an increase in unemployment and social crimes among the youth can

be expected.

(445 words)