雅思大作文政府投资类话题范文--富国该如何帮助穷国

北京雅思培训,雅思备考资料,雅思网课,雅思培训机构,雅思保分班,雅思真题,雅思课程

Task：Developing countries require help offered by international organization

to ensure healthy and sustainable development. Some people think that financial

aid is important. Others believe that practical aid and advice is more

important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

发展中国家需要国际组织提供的帮助，以确保健康和可持续发展。有人认为财政援助是重要的。其他人认为，实际的援助和建议是更重要的。讨论两种观点并给出你自己的看法。

雅思大作文政府投资类话题题库，传送门

思路解析：

1. 确保政府的运行，恢复银行业务以及对于企业的贷款。

2.

金钱是最灵活的援助，它能满足不同国家的一切需求，因为它能进行购买，而实际的援助很多情况下可能不是穷国所真正需要的。举例，给越南大米没有用，它不缺粮食，它的大米可以自给自足，甚至可以出口。

经济援助的风险：

1. 缺乏监管，金钱可能被穷国的官僚贪污。

2. 会被用于打内战，这加剧了平穷。

3. 金钱无法买来一切，比如说各个行业的人才，教师，医生，还有各种相关的知识，技能和经验。

参考范文：

What kind of relief from rich countries should be given priority in terms of

supporting developing countries? Some people think the best answer of this issue

is simply money. Others, however, hold an opposed view that other practical

aids, instead of finance, are a sound decision. personally, I am in favor of the

latter view, and I will explore possible reasons as below.

Firstly, the common root problem of developing countries is the collapsed

administration and economy systems, and their recovery seriously depends on the

transfusing of external capital. Firstly, financial aids allow a poor country to

build up an effective government by paying salaries of governmental personnel

without delay. With stable income, most officials would be satisfied and

motivated to be fully in charge of social technical, executive and supervisory

positions like courts of law, police stations, water and power supply

departments and so forth, thus lifting the community out of street violence,

crimes and living chaos. Besides, financial injection helps to restore the

banking system, which means the availability of commercial loan with low

interest for a large amount of companies eagerly needing money for material

purchase, hiring workers and products manufacturing. Accordingly, what the

capital input brings include vibrant industry and business, ever-increasing job

opportunities and tax revenue for public welfare--in short, a booming social

development on a right track.

Another reason for supporting financial aids is that money is always a

favored kind of donation, because it gives recipients in poor countries a high

flexibility to buy what they are really lack of. In fact, practical needs are

always variable and unpredictable in different countries, people and times ,so

that it is very likely that the common physical goods endowed from rich

countries may not precisely suit demands of local regions. For example, as for

Vietnam which suffers from wars for decades, surprisingly, any type of food aid

from foreign countries is undesirable , for the reason that the yield of grain

produced in this poor country can not only fully feed its people, but also be

more than enough for food export. In contrast, if Vietnam were offered money

directly, it will buy whatever it needs most from international markets,

probably from public transportation to vaccines to school facilities. Therefore,

straight money support is indispensable, its universal effectiveness is always

superior over any other goods-based donation.

However, financial aids do not come without risks, and one of them is about

their misuse. Obviously, in too many developing countries lacking democracy,

public supervision, or accountability and transparency in government operation,

there is a high possibility that the money might be appropriated for personal

sake or even flow into the pocket of bureaucrats--corruption in short,

expectedly. In addition, the most worrying aspect is that in poor countries in

civil war, money will be misspent by warlords buying new weapons and bombs,

instead of foodstuffs or medicines. Consequently, In cases above, the final

application of financial support would depart from its initial charitable

purpose, and it will make social poverty worse, not better.

Moreover, when it comes to healthy and sustainable growth, there are more to

require for a poor country than just buying stuffs by money. Specifically, the

acquirement of core factors that have lasting and fundamental impacts on the

society, such as qualified teachers, doctors, lawyers and scientists, cannot be

achieved by buying, but rather by systematic training and teaching. In other

words, non-financial aids from developed countries are also necessary. For

example, professional teams containing experts in all kinds of fields from

science to medication, from law to social work, should be sent in poor countries

for the purpose of educating their future talents. What is more, observers from

rich countries should also join the running of local government, which ensures

that all kinds of benefaction can be allocated to the public fairly.

In conclusion, financial aids are always needed as the first step for economy

revival. To a larger extent, however, money is very limited and even risky, and

other practical helps, especially the ones associated with human resources,

should be introduced into poor countries.

(681 words)