【刷题锦囊】雅思阅读无限仿真模拟题详解:THE GAP of INGENUITY 2
北京雅思培训,雅思备考资料,雅思网课,雅思培训机构,雅思保分班,雅思真题,雅思课程
易伯华雅思名师讲堂今天和大家分享一篇阅读仿真模拟题“THE GAP of INGENUITY 2”(《创新的空白2》),这是一篇论说文,全文共10段。大家可以在正文中看到原文和题目,可以先自己试着做一做,做完可以看看易伯华名师的悉心讲解。一起来学习吧!
THE GAP of INGENUITY 2
Ingenuity, as I define it here, consists not only of ideas for new
technologies like computers or drought-resistant crops but, more fundamentally,
of ideas for better institutions and social arrangements, like efficient markets
and competent governments.
How much and what kinds of ingenuity a society requires depends on a range of
factors, including the society's goals and the circumstances within which it
must achieve those goals——whether it has a young population or an aging one, an

abundance of natural resources or a scarcity of them, an easy climate or a
punishing one, whatever the case may be.
How much and what kinds of ingenuity a society supplies also depends on many
factors, such as the nature of human inventiveness and understanding, the
rewards an economy gives to the producers of useful knowledge, and the strength
of political opposition to social and institutional reforms.
A good supply of the right kind of ingenuity is essential, but it isn't, of
course, enough by itself. We know that the creation of wealth, for example,
depends not only on an adequate supply of useful ideas but also on the
availability of other, more conventional factors of production, like capital and
labor. Similarly, prosperity, stability and justice usually depend on the
resolution, or at least the containment, of major political struggles over
wealth and power. Yet within our economics ingenuity often supplants labor, and
growth in the stock of physical plant is usually accompanied by growth in the
stock of ingenuity. And in our political systems, we need great ingenuity to set
up institutions that successfully manage struggles over wealth and power.
Clearly, our economic and political processes are intimately entangled with the
production and use of ingenuity.
The past century’s countless incremental changes in our societies around the
planet, in our technologies and our interactions with our surrounding natural
environments have accumulated to create a qualitatively new world. Because these
changes have accumulated slowly, It’s often hard for us to recognize how
profound and sweeping they've. They include far larger and denser populations;
much higher per capita consumption of natural resources; and far better and more
widely available technologies for the movement of people, materials, and
especially information.
In combination, these changes have sharply increased the density, intensity,
and pace of our inter actions with each other; they have greatly increased the
burden we place on our natural environment; and they have helped shift power
from national and international institutions to individuals and subgroups, such
as political special interests and ethnic factions.
As a result, people in all walks of life-from our political and business
leaders to all of us in our day-to-day——must cope with much more complex,
urgent, and often unpredictable circumstances. The management of our
relationship with this new world requires immense and ever-increasing amounts of
social and technical ingenuity. As we strive to maintain or increase our
prosperity and improve the quality of our lives, we must make far more
sophisticated decisions, and in less time, than ever before.
When we enhance the performance of any system, from our cars to the planet's
network of financial institutions, we tend to make it more complex. Many of the
natural systems critical to our well-being, like the global climate and the
oceans, are extraordinarily complex to begin with. We often can't predict or
manage the behavior of complex systems with much precision, because they are
often very sensitive to the smallest of changes and perturbations, and their
behavior can flip from one mode to another suddenly and dramatically. In
general, as the human-made and natural systems we depend upon become more
complex, and as our demands on them increase, the institutions and technologies
we use to manage them must become more complex too, which further boosts our
need for ingenuity.
The good news, though, is that the last century's stunning changes in our
societies and technologies have not just increased our need for ingenuity; they
have also produced a huge increase in its supply. The growth and urbanization of
human populations have combined with astonishing new communication and
transportation technologies to expand interactions among people and produce
larger, more integrated, and more efficient markets. These changes have, in
turn, vastly accelerated the generation and delivery of useful ideas.
But—and this is the critical "but"——we should not jump to the conclusion that
the supply of ingenuity always increases in lockstep with our ingenuity
requirement: While it's true that necessity is often the mother of invention, we
can't always rely on the right kind of ingenuity appearing when and where we
need it. In many cases, the complexity and speed of operation of today's vital
economic, social, arid ecological systems exceed the human brains grasp. Very
few of us have more than a rudimentary understanding of how these systems work.
They remain fraught with countless "unknown unknowns," which makes it hard to
supply the ingenuity we need to solve problems associated with these
systems.
In this book, explore a wide range of other factors that will limit our
ability to supply the ingenuity required in the coming century. For example,
many people believe that new communication technologies strengthen democracy and
will make it easier to find solutions to our societies' collective problems, but
the story is less clear than it seems. The crush of information in our everyday
lives is shortening our attention span, limiting the time we have to reflect on
critical matters of public policy, and making policy arguments more
superficial.
Modern markets and science are an important part of the story of how we
supply ingenuity. Markets are critically important, because they give
entrepreneurs an incentive to produce knowledge. As for science, although it
seems to face no theoretical limits, at least in the foreseeable future,
practical constraints often slow its progress. The cost of scientific research
tends to increase as it delves deeper into nature. And science's rate of advance
depends on the characteristic of the natural phenomena it investigates, simply
because some phenomena are intrinsically harder to understand than others, so
the production of useful new knowledge in these areas can be very slow.
Consequently, there is often a critical time lag between the recognition between
a problem and the delivery of sufficient ingenuity, in the form of technologies,
to solve that problem. Progress in the social sciences is especially slow, for
reasons we don't yet understand; but we desperately need better social
scientific knowledge to build the sophisticated institutions today’s world
demands.
Questions:
Complete each sentence with the appropriate answer, A, B, C, or D
Write the correct answer in boxes 27-30 on your answer sheet.
27 The definition of ingenuity
28 The requirement for ingenuity
29 The creation of social wealth
30 The stability of society
A depends on many factors including climate.
B depends on the management and solution of disputes.
C is not only of technological advance, but more of institutional
renovation.
D also depends on the availability of some traditional resources.
Question 31-33
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C, or D.
Write your answers in boxes 31-33 on your answer sheet.
31 What does the author say about the incremental change of the last 100
years?
A It has become a hot scholastic discussion among environmentalists.
B Its significance is often not noticed.

C It has reshaped the natural environments we live in.
D It benefited a much larger population than ever.
32 The combination of changes has made life.
A easier
B faster
C slower
D less sophisticated
33 What does the author say about the natural systems?
A New technologies are being developed to predict change with precision.
B Natural systems are often more sophisticated than other systems.
C Minor alterations may cause natural systems to change dramatically.
D Technological developments have rendered human being more independent of
natural systems.
Question 34-40
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading
Passage 3?
In boxes 34-40 on your answer sheet, write
YES if the statement is true
NO if the statement is false
NOT GIVEN if the information is not given in the passage
34 The demand for ingenuity has been growing during the past 100 years.
35 The ingenuity we have may be inappropriate for solving problems at
hand.
36 There are very few who can understand the complex systems of the present
world.
37 More information will help us to make better decisions.
38 The next generation will blame the current government for their
conduct.
39 Science tends to develop faster in certain areas than others.
40 Social science develops especially slowly because it is not as important
as natural science.
(转第二页)
免费1对1规划学习方法
剑桥大学&双硕士