【易伯华独家】雅思阅读全真模考题:智力的开端
北京雅思培训,雅思备考资料,雅思网课,雅思培训机构,雅思保分班,雅思真题,雅思课程
易伯华雅思名师讲堂从今天开始和大家分享一系列阅读仿真模拟题,可以说与雅思真题99%相似,是烤鸭在剑桥雅思之余的良好调剂品。烤鸭们可以先自己试着做一做,做完之后可以对下答案,再看看易伯华名师的悉心讲解。本篇阅读的标题:智力的开端。
The beginning of intelligence
A No one doubts that intelligence develops as children grow older. Yet the
concept of intelligence has proved both quite difficult to define in unambiguous
terms and unexpectedly controversial in some respects. Although, at one level,
there seem to be almost as many definitions of intelligence as people who have
tried to define it, there is broad agreement on two key features. That is,
intelligence involves the capacity not only to learn from experience but also to
adapt to one's environment. However, we cannot leave the concept there. Before
turning to what is known about the development of intelligence, it is necessary
to consider whether we are considering the growth of one or many skills. That
question has been tackled in rather different ways by psychometricians(心理测量师)and
by developmentalists.
B The former group has examined the issue by determining how children's
abilities on a wide range of tasks intercorrelate, or go together. Statistical
techniques have been used to find out whether the patterns are best explained by
one broad underlying capacity, general intelligence, or by a set of multiple,
relatively separate, special skills in domains such as verbal and visuospatial
ability. While it cannot be claimed that everyone agrees on what the results
mean, most people now accept that for practical purposes it is reasonable to
suppose that both are involved. In brief,the evidence in favour of some kind of
general intellectual capacity is that people who are superior (or inferior) on
one type of task tend also to be superior (or inferior) on others. Moreover,
general measures of intelligence tend to have considerable powers to predict a
person's performance on a wide range of tasks requiring special skills.
Nevertheless, it is plain that it is not at all uncommon for individuals to be
very good at some sorts of task and yet quite poor at some others.
C Furthermore the influences that affect verbal skills are not quite the same
as those that affect other skills. This approach to investigating intelligence
is based on the nature of the task involved, but studies of age-related changes
show that this is not the only, or necessarily the most important, approach. For
instance, some decades ago, Horn and Cattell argued for a differentiation
between what they termed 'fluid' and 'crystallised' intelligence. Fluid
abilities are best assessed by tests that require mental manipulation of
abstract symbols. Crystallised abilities, by contrast, reflect knowledge of the
environment in which we live and past experience of similar tasks; they may be
assessed by tests of comprehension and information. It seems that fluid
abilities peak in early adult life, whereas crystallised abilities increase up
to advanced old age.
D Developmental studies also show that the interconnections between different
skills vary with age. Thus in the first year of life an interest in perceptual
patterns is a major contributor to cognitive abilities, whereas verbal abilities
are more important later on. These findings seemed to suggest a substantial lack
of continuity between infancy and middle childhood. However, it is important to
realize that the apparent discontinuity will vary according to which of the
cognitive skills were assessed in infancy. It has been found that tests of
coping with novelty do predict later intelligence. These findings reinforce the
view that young children's intellectual performance needs to be assessed from
their interest in and curiosity about the environment, and the extent to which
this is applied to new situations, as well as by standardised intelligence
testing.
E These psychometric approaches have focused on children’s increase in
cognitive skills as they grow older. Piaget (著名儿童教育学家) brought about a
revolution in the approach to cognitive development through his arguments
(backed up by observations) that the focus should be on the thinking processes
involved rather than on levels of cognitive achievement. These ideas of Piaget
gave rise to an immense body of research and it would be true to say that
subsequent thinking has been heavily dependent on his genius in opening up new
ways of thinking about cognitive development. Nevertheless, most of his concepts
have had to be so radically revised, or rejected, that his theory no longer
provides an appropriate basis for thinking about cognitive development. To
appreciate why that is so, we need to focus on some rather different elements of
Piaget’s theorising.
F The first element, which has stood the test of time, is his view that the
child is an active agent of learning and of the importance of this activity in
cognitive development. Numerous studies have shown how infants actively scan
their environment; how they prefer patterned to non-patterned objects, how they
choose novel over familiar stimuli, and how they explore their environment as if
to see how it works. Children's questions and comments vividly illustrate the
ways in which they are constantly constructing schemes of what they know and
trying out their ideas of how to fit new knowledge into those schemes or
deciding that the schemes need modification. Moreover, a variety of studies have
shown that active experiences have a greater effect on learning than comparable
passive experiences. However, a second element concerns the notion that the
development proceeds through a series of separate stages that have to be gone
through step-by-step, in a set order, each of which is characterized by a
particular cognitive structure. That has turned out to be a rather misleading
way of thinking about cognitive development, although it is not wholly
wrong.
Questions 14-17
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C, or D.
Write your answers in boxes 27-30 on your answer sheet
14 Most researchers accept that one feature of intelligence is the ability
to
A change our behaviour according to our situation.
B react to others' behaviour patterns.

C experiment with environmental features.
D cope with unexpected setbacks.
15 What have psychometricians used statistics for?
A to find out if cooperative tasks are a useful tool in measuring certain
skills
B to explore whether several abilities are involved in the development of
intelligence
C to demonstrate that mathematical models can predict test results for
different skills
D to discover whether common sense is fundamental to developing children's
abilities
16 Why are Horn and Cattell mentioned?
A They disagreed about the interpretation of different intelligence
tests.
B Their research concerned both linguistic and mathematical abilities.
C They were the first to prove that intelligence can be measured by testing a
range of special skills.
D Their work was an example of research into how people's cognitive skills
vary with age.
17 What was innovative about Piagct's research?
A He refused to accept that children developed according to a set
pattern.
B He emphasised the way children thought more than how well they did in
tests.
C He used visually appealing materials instead of traditional intelligence
tests.
D He studied children of all ages and levels of intelligence.
Questions 18-22
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading
Passage 3?
In boxes 31-36 on your answer sheet, write
YES if the statement is true
NO if the statement is false
NOT GIVEN if the information is not given in the passage
18 A surprising number of academics have come to the same conclusion about
what the term intelligence means.
19 A general test of intelligence is unlikely to indicate the level of
performance in every type of task.
20 The elderly perform less well on comprehension tests than young
adults.
21 We must take into account which skills are tested when comparing
intelligence at different ages.
22 Piaget's work influenced theoretical studies more than practical
research.
Questions 23-26
Complete the summary using the list of words, A-1, below.
Write your answers in boxes 37-40 on your answer sheet.
Researchers investigating the development of intelligence have shown that 23
skills become more significant with age. One good predictor of 24 intelligence
is the degree to which small children are 25 about their surroundings and how
much interest they show on finding themselves in an 26 setting.
A adult B practical C verbal
D spatial E inquisitive F uncertain
G academic H plentiful I unfamiliar
免费1对1规划学习方法
剑桥大学&双硕士