9分考官级雅思大作文范文之动物实验利弊

北京雅思培训,雅思备考资料,雅思网课,雅思培训机构,雅思保分班,雅思真题,雅思课程

本文为大家带来雅思写作范文，题目是Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new

medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these

experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to

suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to

humanity.Discuss both views and give your own

opinion.动物实验对动物残忍，动物实验对人类有益。讨论并给出你的观点?精研优秀范文而后反复练习反复修改是雅思写作提升的不二之途。烤鸭加油。

考官级范文库：6大题型36篇9分雅思写作范文汇总分享

范文：

It is true that medicines and other products are routinely tested on animals

before they are cleared for human use. While I tend towards the viewpoint that

animal testing is morally wrong, I would have to support a limited amount of

animal experimentation for the development of medicines.

On the one hand, there are clear ethical arguments against animal

experimentation. To use a common example of this practice, laboratory mice may

be given an illness so that the effectiveness of a new drug can be measured.

Opponents of such research argue that humans have no right to subject animals to

this kind of trauma, and that the lives of all creatures should be respected.

They believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused,

and that scientists should use alternative methods of research.

On the other hand, reliable alternatives to animal experimentation may not

always be available. Supporters of the use of animals in medical research

believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be

justified if human lives are saved. They argue that opponents of such research

might feel differently if a member of their own families needed a medical

treatment that had been developed through the use of animal experimentation.

Personally, I agree with the banning of animal testing for non-medical products,

but I feel that it may be a necessary evil where new drugs and medical

procedures are concerned.

In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be wrong to ban testing on

animals for vital medical research until equally effective alternatives have

been developed.

(270 words, band 9)