8月27日雅思写作考试真题大作文范文

北京雅思培训,雅思备考资料,雅思网课,雅思培训机构,雅思保分班,雅思真题,雅思课程

8月27日雅思写作考试真题：Some people think that it is more important to plant more trees in open

areas in towns and cities than provides more housing. To what extent do you

agree or disagree?

有人认为比起提供更多的房子，在城镇开放地区种更多的树更为重要。你在多大程度上同意或者不同意?

8月27日雅思大作文范文汇总，点击查看

When it comes to the issue about how towns and cities could utilize their

open areas, some people may argue that planting more trees seems more crucial

than constructing more houses, but I cannot agree with this opinion.

Admittedly, having more trees may contribute to protecting our environment.

Currently, vehicles may produce a lot of toxic gases, posing a threat to the

environment, especially the environment in downtown. Then, if there exist more

trees in a city or a town, those plants could filter some gases, such as carbon

dioxide that may aggravate global warming. Nevertheless, offering residents more

dwelling places may be one of the top priorities for the authorities.

Initially, a larger number of houses in cities could alleviate dweller’s

economic burdens. It is common that the price of real estate in some cities

could be so high that normal citizens cannot afford it. If governments could

supply more houses, then, the price of housing may be lowered correspondingly

since the supply of housing may exceed its demand. Then, more individuals are

potent to own a house in cities, but not live in a temporary one anymore.

Furthermore, building more houses in towns and counties could also serve to

boost local economy. When governments decide to construct more buildings in

towns, it may lead to a better economic outlook. For example, if there were more

houses available for either living or commercial purpose in a town, more

investors would find its potential and naturally more funding would also be

allocated to that town. Then, local economy could be improved a lot with both

financial support from governments and private investment from merchants.

In sum, considering that a larger quantity of houses could reduce economic

burdens of citizens and function as a catalyst for rural development

simultaneously, building more houses deserves more attention and budgets from

the government.

(308 words)

以上内容原载于“panda writing”，如有版权问题，请联系易伯华管理员修改或删除。