雅思课外读物-- Video games are great literature?

北京雅思培训,雅思备考资料,雅思网课,雅思培训机构,雅思保分班,雅思真题,雅思课程

今天要分享的雅思阅读素材是一篇关于视频游戏的文章，题目叫“Video games are great literature?

视频游戏是伟大的文学作品吗?”哈哈，这个问题大家一定会感兴趣!很多人都喜欢玩游戏，为了游戏很多人简直是废寝忘食啊，周杰伦都因为玩游戏上央视新闻了，所以你还不来看看这篇文章到底说了些什么吗?

It’s an unfortunate feature of working as both a novelist and a games

designer that I end up sitting through a lot of panels, round-tables,

conferences, discussions and other exercises in head-nodding where digital

people try to get to grips with(对付;处理)storytelling, or where story people try to

understand the digital world.

(身兼写小说和设计游戏两职，我工作中一个非常不幸的特征是不得不经常置身许多专题会、圆桌会、研讨会、讨论会以及其他摇头晃脑的锻炼场合，在这些场合中，数字人试图解决讲故事的问题，或者讲故事的人试图理解数字世界。)

Both these types of event have their aggravations.(这两类活动都各有其令人恼火之处。) When

digital people run workshops or colloquia or jams (there are infinite names for

the basic principle of bringing people together in combination with coffee)

about storytelling, they often seem not to notice that quite a lot of very

clever people have been thinking very hard about stories for, oh, the past

3,000-4,000 years. I’ve heard people suggest that maybe stories have a “pattern”

or “structural ordering” that holds together their parts, without apparently

realizing that a lot of people have written about this, from Aristotle on.

And let’s not even get on to (听信) the people who say things like “data is a

story”, “products are a story”, “your robo-vacuum cleaner has a story to tell

you”. No it isn’t, no they’re not, and no – unless artificial

intelligence(人工智能)has come on much faster than anticipated(期待)– it doesn’t.

But more aggravating even than this are the forums, summits, breakout

sessions and seminars on “digital literature” run by exceedingly(非常，特别地)

well-meaning arts people who can talk for hours about what the future might be

for storytelling in this new technological age – whether we might produce

hyperlinked(超链接的)or interactive(互动的)or multi-stranded novels and poems – without

apparently noticing that video games exist. And they don’t just exist! They’re

the most lucrative(有利可图的), fastest-growing medium of our age.

(电子游戏岂止简单地存在!它们可是这个时代最赚钱，成长最快的媒介!)Your experimental technological literature is

already here; it’s the noise you’re trying to get your children to turn down

while you pen(用笔写)your thoughts about the future of location-based

storytelling.(技术实验性的文学已然在这儿，就是你在梳理基于地点的故事讲述之未来的时候，想方设法让你孩子关小的那些噪音。)

When I bring this up with arts and literary types, I often get the sort of

“oh come, come” response that can only emerge (出现)from someone who has no

familiarity whatsoever with what video games are, have been, and can be.

(当我向那些艺术和文学类的人提起这点时，我得到的反应通常是“噢，别，别”，只有那些对电子游戏的过去，现在和未来毫不知情的人才可能做出这种反应。)“You

can’t claim that Grand Theft Auto has literary merit,” they say. Maybe you can –

plenty of people have – but no, I wouldn’t cite GTA as fascinating experimental

literature any more than I’d cite robo-Godzilla-fighting blockbuster Pacific Rim

as an example of avant-garde(先锋派)film-making (it’s fun though).

But are there video games experimenting with more interesting storytelling

than any “digital literature” project I’ve seen? Yes, certainly. And if you want

to think of yourself as well read, or well cultured, you need to engage with

them.(如果你想自己成为一个阅读广泛、文化精深的人，你就需要融入到它们之中。)

To pick just 10 examples from recent years, it’s hard to imagine how you

could opine on(对……发表意见)the future of literature without having played the

brilliantly characterful and fourth-wall breaking Portal, the sombre(阴郁的)and

engrossing(引人入胜的) Papers, Please, or the dazzlingly surreal (超现实的)exploration of

the American subconscious, Kentucky Route Zero. Are you interested in discussing

experimental “read it in any order” literature(一种文学形式，读者可以从任何地方开始阅读)? Then for

goodness’ sake, play the mystery narratives of Her Story and Gone Home and the

hilarious and unsettling The Stanley Parable. If you want to talk about how

writers can engage with politics, capitalism, or the environmental movement,

you’ll be showing your ignorance if you haven’t played Oiligarchy.

Interested in how storytellers can engage with themes of mortality(死亡)?

You’ll want Spider: The Secret of Bryce Manor, or Jason Rohrer’s short, powerful

game Passage, or the sublime Journey. Each of these games could – and probably

should – be taught in schools to inspire(激励)the next generation of creators.

The problem is that people who like science and technology, and people who

like storytelling and the arts have typically been placed in different buildings

since about the age of 16. We haven’t been taught how to admire each others’

work, to recognize excellence, or even to know that there is excellence in “the

other culture”. There’s a kind of sullen arrogance(自大，傲慢) on both sides, with

some people in both camps simply denying that the other knows anything worth

listening to. There is a kind of “worthy” arts professional who thinks that

knowing nothing about games – like saying “I don’t even own a television!” – is

a marker of intellectual

superiority.(有一类自诩为“有价值的”艺术专业人员认为，对游戏一无所知，比方说些“我甚至连电视机都没有!”之类的话，就标志着他们在智力上要高人一筹。)

But we can’t afford that kind of thinking any more. Being culturally educated

about video games is as important as going to museums or learning about opera.

Games often manage to be both great art and an economic powerhouse; we’re doing

ourselves and the next generation a disservice (伤害)if we don’t take that

seriously.(如果我们不认真对待的话，我们会对自己和下一代造成伤害。)